Accessibility statement for Flamingospa Oy

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The overall color scheme of the site largely does not meet the minimum contrast requirement. The site contains a lot of text and elements with different colored backgrounds, making it challenging for some users to distinguish from the background.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 1.4.3 Contrast (minimum)
● 1.4.11 Non-text contrast

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The site includes some links where an image background is used, with text describing the purpose of the link overlaid on the image. Depending on the image, these texts can be difficult to read for some user groups.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 1.4.3 Contrast (minimum)

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Images adjacent to the site’s headings lack accessible texts.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 1.1.1 Non-text content

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The site contains link cards with keywords structured as lists. These lists have non-permissible elements that can affect the accessibility of the card.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 1.3.1 Information and relationships

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: There are structural deficiencies in the order of the site’s headers, which can affect the site’s accessibility.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 1.3.1 Information and relationships

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: In the footer menu, links are emphasized using bold text. The footer also contains headings that look similar to footer links but are not links.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 1.4.1 Use of color

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The product pages include an Additional Information table that is not fully accessible on mobile devices.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 1.4.10 Responsiveness

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: There are issues with visible keyboard focus in buttons and links on the site. Some elements lack visible focus or do not sufficiently contrast with the background.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.4 Link purpose (in context)
● 2.4.7 Visible focus

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Users relying solely on the keyboard cannot navigate to the site search.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.1.1 Keyboard

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The booking calendar cannot be fully accessed using only the keyboard when there are no available times in the current monthly view. There are accessibility issues with the texts on the booking calendar.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.1.1 Keyboard 2.4.4
● Link purpose (in context)

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Users cannot navigate back to the cookie settings modal once on the site unless they immediately decide to accept or reject cookie settings. The modal remains open and cannot be closed using only the keyboard. The keyboard focus color in the cookie settings modal is not sufficiently contrasting.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.1.1 Keyboard
● 2.4.7 Visible focus

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Keyboard-only users cannot navigate to sub-links under main navigation links. The hamburger menu cannot be navigated using only the keyboard.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.1.1 Keyboard

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Users cannot rate on the TripAdvisor form using only the keyboard. The form also lacks visible keyboard focus indicators.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.1.1 Keyboard 2.4.7 Visible focus

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Carousel focus order can complicate its use with screen readers on mobile devices.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.3 Focus order

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: There are text accessibility issues in the accessible texts of the cart and login icons. The texts are currently in English on the Finnish version of the site. The cart icon does not inform whether there are products in the cart.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.4 Link purpose (in context)

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: There are multiple logos in the footer lacking accessible descriptive texts. The “Partner Hotels” page features logos without accessible descriptive texts.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.4 Link purpose (in context)

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Articles feature buttons for sharing on various social media channels. These buttons lack accessible texts.
Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.4 Link purpose (in context)

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: On mobile devices, navigation with submenu links is not clearly indicated.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.4 Link purpose (in context)

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The site includes some generic “Read more” button texts that do not adequately describe the link content.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.4 Link purpose (in context)

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: Some forms on the site use a ReCAPTCHA element with a timeout that users cannot control.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.2.1 Adjustable timing

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: On smaller screens, the focus order of the hero element’s buttons is not logical when using the keyboard.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 2.4.3 Focus Order

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The site search page text field lacks instructions for screen readers on what to input.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 3.3.2 Labels or instructions

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: There are several forms on the site lacking clear instructions that * -mark indicates that field is mandatory.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 3.3.2 Labels or instructions

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The site contains some Finnish terms on buttons and instructions.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 3.1.2 Language of Parts

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The TripAdvisor element text field on the feedback page lacks a label attribute describing the field’s purpose.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 4.1.2 Name, role, value

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: The search page does not notify the screen reader after entering a search term that the results have been updated on the page.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 4.1.3 Status messages

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: There are issues in informing screen reader users about the selection of e-commerce filters and changes in product selection.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 4.1.3 Status messages

Unreachable content and its deficiencies: There are deficiencies in the fields of product forms: Gift Card message and Shipping Method lack accessible labels.

Accessibility criteria that are not met:
● 4.1.2 Name, role, value